INDEPENDENT COVID RESEARCH
Introduction: This DATA was collected to help illustrate “WHY” individuals should be cautious about the “COVID Vaccine(s)” and possible government mandates.
Quote: “… Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by way of inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. And those in world history who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again …” – Pres. Reagan
Ref Link: Reagan Library
Constitutional Opinion: “The United States Federal Government has “NO” constitutional authority in my humble opinion to subject by force (mandate) any individual to receive medical treatment “they,” “adult,” “he or she” “DO NOT DESIRE.” Such a “medical mandate” would be a violation of an individual’s “contractual right(s) inshrined in the understanding of “private property.” An individuals’ body is an absolute and uttermost form of property right, superseding “ALL” other forms of property (Ex: Land(s), Building(s), Car(s), Digital/ Non-Digital, etc.).” – Brandon Everett Schuchardt
- The current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), (100 EMPLOYEE +) “Mandate” by the 46th President of the United States Joe Biden is “NOT” legislative but mandated by executive powers (declaration / decree / “order”) that I believe fails to meet “presidential constitutional delegated authority.” President Biden is “NOT” a dictator as we in the States of America got inherited by our founders a Constitutional Republic restraining those elected and non-elected officials from abuse of power …
OSHA Website URL: http://www.osha.gov
Oral Argument: Article II of the United States Constitution grants “NO” power of the President of the United States to force their medical opinion and/or “WILL” to mandate any legal resident of any county or State territory to receive by mandate a particular form(s) of medical treatment.
OSHA created by former President Richard Nixon in 1970 “DID NOT” visualize “Nor Congress (Foresee)” from a textualist argument while legislation got drafted and signed into law that the administrative powers of OSHA would have the ability to violate “free will (CHOICE) of the individual(s), employee(s) and employer(s) by having the ability to cancel-out a willful needed contractual consent from those parties by replacing it with an authoritarian “FEDERAL” government mandate by given this administration and “FUTURE” administrations the ability to “FORCE” (a form of national servitude) medical treatment on its overall populations.
If this “DELEGATED POWER” is “NOT” enshrined (granted) in the U.S. Constitution, the “mandate” would, in my humble opinion, get overruled by the Courts. If not, the United States Congress. This overreach is an abuse of executive powers and is a version of a modern-day form of medical tyranny. President Biden’s decision to enforce this overreach must be carefully examined by both sides of the political spectrum to minimize any form of political and moral bias from the left ideological side and the conservative political wing.
Questionable “AND/OR” Plausible ???:
If the courts do “NOTHING” to stop this administrations nationalized overreach of tyrannical presidential power, what’s next in the plausible days, months, years to come? As a conservative-minded libertarian, I believe that legislative text(s), AKA – OSHA powers, should only be interpreted by its original purpose by understanding its historical texts. As one can see, I hold to an old-fashion form of legal interpretation as I consider myself a textualist. This rule should apply to any legislation passed into law by Congress. If so, did the OSHA legislation grant “power(s)” to the President to become a middle man interpreter of Americans’ medical decision-making? Did it grant the President to coerce “individual(s) by voiding contractual rights, therefore ending “FREE WILL?” Did it give the President emergency power(s) to become the American Peoples (We The People) doctor ???
I hope the majority of Americans “AGREE” with me and “Congress,” including the “Courts,” that the historical texts of OSHA did “NOT” grant such broad presidential dictatorial powers. What scary times we live in a “SO-CALLED” free society.
What’s Next? Paper Medical Passports including but are not limited to an electronic scanning system to verify these vaccines. The Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler, if resurrected, would marvel at such modern-day medical technologies that could control the humanities population. Instead of traveling papers, “Show me your papers” – Nazi’s orders of old – could have mandated a “MOBILE APP” or say we “MUST” scan the numbers of the Jewish prisoner’s bodies to verify such medical documentation of such peoples. Sure laugh at this statement. I assure you if we could take a time machine and go back one hundred (100) years, this current debate of vaccine mandate(s) would “NOT” have gotten debated in our society. If one can not “LEARN FROM HISTORY,” we will repeat it. What if, just what if, Hitler would have had not just his power but our modern-day medical technologies at his disposal?
I can assure listeners this, the day I take this vaccine by “FREE WILL” will first be the day another vaccine becomes available to end a more deadly virus, the virus that creates tyrants.
Major Historical Tyrants of Humanities Past
1. Adolf Hitler
2. Joseph Stalin
3. Benito Mussolini
Just these three most historical tyrants of man’s modern area would marvel at what this “ORDER” allows any national government to sustain in their depravity to control humanity. The lusts of envy from these leaders would applaud President Biden’s right to override and erode the United States Constitution and our beloved Bill of Rights granted to all free peoples of this Grand Republic.
Plausible Microchipping, is it “NOT” around the blocks of our communities? Maybe just maybe (?), some of these conspiratorial viewpoints by those deemed within societies to be “nut-jobs” have creditability. Why you ask,? Because if we allow our nation-state central government the ability to make medical choices against the free will of its people, future crises will continue, which could lead to such theories. Desperately think upon this, shall you? I do, and it scares me regarding my daughter’s future. If not you, I question the humanity within every one of you individuals. Reference: Human Medical Microchipping Link
- The United States Constitution’s design is to guarantee protections from abuse of powers. The job of the central government is too “NOT” be a nanny state. The position of the central government is to assist its nation’s territories. The Tenth Amendment clearly states the following …
Oral Argument: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” 10th Amendment U.S. Constitution.
If this power is “NOT” granted to the President under “OSHA” guidelines from a historical textualist point-of-view, “NOR” does the “CONSTITUTION” allow the federal government this grand and “DELEGATED POWER,” this power, this right “MUST” return to the State governments and its local peoples sovereignty.
I dare ask the audience this straightforward question (???) what is the purpose behind the Tenth (10th) Amendment of the U.S. Constitution if we do “NOT” interpret the Constitution only from a historical / textualist point of view? Many constitutional scholars deem that the U.S. Constitution grants delegated powers.
Meaning: Powers granted by its sovereign citizens. President Biden is thus an employee, and therefore, he works for not just myself but every citizen in this nation. What a difference between a dictatorship and a democratic constitutional system of our republic. I dare say once again that this is indeed scary if we give President Biden or “EVEN” any future President (Right or Left) such broad emergency powers. Will this power be laid down when this crisis is over? Even if claimed “YES” by such powerful foes, should we trust that this “BROAD POWER” gets relinquished?
The goal once again by the constitutional restraint of our national government should “NOT” however, not try to help those within this medical pandemic crisis. A moral and just federal government should be assisting State Governments as “THEY” (the States or its local powers) do what is best for its people in the “THEIR” community. The Feds can help on various fronts. A.) Provide funding to hospitals, clinics, public schools, etc. Even provide “FREE Testing” and B.) ”PROVIDE” optional vaccines (paid-out-of-pocket) by the citizens’ national government. Virtually all rational citizens can logically agree with the government providing these vaccines at low “OR” no cost during the pandemic. The argument here is “NOT” if a person has the liberty to get the vaccine, but if a person loses “FREE CONTRACTUAL WILL” from deciding if they want the vaccine.
If the Courts or Congress lets this administration “GET AWAY” with this medical tyranny, “We The People” I assure you will be subjected to future medical tyrannical decisions in the years to come by our national leaders.
The Meaning of Tyranny
Essential Meaning of Tyranny:
1 : cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others
The refugees were fleeing tyranny.
He was dedicated to ending the tyranny of slavery.
2 : a government in which all power belongs to one person : the rule or authority of a tyrant
The king sought an absolute tyranny over the colonies.
Full Definition of Tyranny:
1 : oppressive power
every form of tyranny over the mind of man — Thomas Jefferson
especially : oppressive power exerted by government
the tyranny of a police state
2 a : a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler
especially : one characteristic of an ancient Greek city-state
b: the office, authority, and administration of a tyrant
3 a : a rigorous condition imposed by some outside agency or force
living under the tyranny of the clock — Dixon Wecter
4 b : an oppressive, harsh, or unjust act : a tyrannical act workers who had suffered tyrannies
If I got given the opportunity to speak to Congress, or the U.S. President regarding this pandemic issue, I would boldly ask, “NO,” I instead would humble myself towards these magistrates and beg for the mercy of our peoples’ independence returned. I would ask for our liberty back from the “FEW” Legislative and Executive Branch tyrants seeking to rule over the sovereign. The right of a “FREE WILL” (free choice) medical system should get granted without restraint from a centralized government institution. Leave it to the States.
Benjamin Franklin, a founder of our Grand Republic, was famed throughout France with the intellectual elites. Old Ben delivered a Petition of the Continental Congress, dated October 26th, 1774, and signed by fifty-one delegates to the Congress; the petition got sent to King George III (Britain’s Monarchy). The petition, of two copies sent to Franklin, wrote “stated” the grievances of the American provinces and asked for the King’s help in seeking solutions.
What America is fighting against today towards this “mandate” isn’t so much towards curving and eventually winning this war against “COVID.” Still, it is a “mandate” against a person’s bodily property rights of their own “sovereign identity,” their own “individual independence” as a human. I would, therefore, “ask” for help that our national government would return to a common ground consensus and let us “keep” our identity as people(s). I would ask that they allow the sovereign not to get devoured above our constitutional rights by those seeking to remove the belief in individual individualism by deeming a national collective force is preferable.
It appears America needs to a degree some form of a new form of independence. We must peacefully petition and diligently ask our leaders to come to common ground and unit in the unity of not “forced collectivism” but guide them towards individualism that morally directs its path towards a people’s willful charity of helping those in need. This charity controlled at State and local levels by free will choice, not an authoritative federal (national) mandate that removes the rights of people, would better serve to end this pandemic in a nation built upon the pillars of liberty.
Therefore “WE THE PEOPLE” of the United States building upon the pillars of liberty “ASK” President Biden (not a king) but a President to give us back our peoples identities. This action is rooted in immorality, and only a belief in tyranny could produce such an evil belief that one man “crowned” or “not” deems they have such “Grand Non-Delegated Powers.”
Nations like China, countries like Cuba, nations within Europe might deem “they” can override citizens’ medical free will. Leaders from both parties might claim we need to follow suit. Let’s not be fooled. America is an exceptional nation. America is a nation designed fundamentally differently than other non-democratic and even democratic systems throughout the community of our international systems. America differs simply because the foundation of America was built on the decentralization of national powers and grants only those within Power, local, State, and Federal “only delegated authority.” America differs simply because the foundation of America liberated the individual from the collective control of national centralization.
In a way, America had two forms of Independence. One structure was that the American Colonies would receive Independence from the British Crown. The other was Independence for her citizens from future nationalized central tyranny, thus creating the United States Bill of Rights.
America’s founders even curb our democratic process by “NOT” allowing a majority to force “THEIR ABSOLUTE WILL” on a tiny minority or a substantial minority. Our Constitutional Republic got drafted to protect the collective rights of all individual groups, majorities, and all sizes of minorities.
I firmly believe Biden’s order is unconstitutional; therefore, in my opinion, illegal action by the 46th President of the United States and his administration must be challenged courageously within the framework of constitutional protests. The people’s right to court action “MUST” follow suit and continue until the “HIGHEST COURT OF OUR LAND” agrees to hear this case. I firmly believe this case will be the case of the ages within the pillars holding up the halls of our Supreme Court. This case will determine if the centralized hungry power-grabbers can “FORCE” this mandate on its citizens. My desire as a kid was to be an attorney. I can tell you I would hunger to fight this case in the courts. This fight is indeed worth fighting for because the outcome(s) of future generations free will inherited rights are in jeopardy.
It is claimed that Old Ben got asked what form of government was created within this great land of old glory. Franklin stated, “.…A Republic if you can keep it….”
I wonder if we will keep it in our age or lose it by a false sense of security regarding this COVID pandemic?
Maybe we already lost it and I am just “NOW” realizing this reality.
IF “CONGRESS WILL NOT ACT” OR THE “COURTS FAIL US” What are the alternative plausible solutions to stop this medical-tyranny?
- The United States Constitution’s is drafted to allow the “majority of States” to call for a Constitutional Convention. This convention could “MANDATE” that the Federal Government can “NO LONGER” coerce any form of mandated vaccination or medical treatment of any kind against the peoples “FREE WILL.”
Oral Argument: “The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.” Article V U.S. Constitution.
The people of the United States might need to utilize this right within the Constitution to “STOP” the tyrannical corrosion of our “individual” rights as “freely independent citizens” of our nation. The people should, and in “ALL REALITY,” they “MUST TAKE ACTION.”
If I were a legislator, I would be seeking to write an amendment as we speak.
- Dismantle Federal OSHA. States should have the legal right to withdraw themselves from the Federal government OSHA legislation. In my opinion, President’s Biden mandate would “NO LONGER” be applicable in such States if the local powers withdrew from OSHA dictations, thus “VOIDING” Biden’s presidential mandate.
Oral Argument: For decades the “Federal Government” has been manipulating our citizens into believing that “THEY” have virtually unlimited “powers.” This “HOWEVER” is a lie by our elected political leaders in Washington D.C. What has been going on in this nation is that our leaders “twist & turn” constitutional texts to meet “THEIR” needed interpretations.
I urge all “STATES GOVERNMENTS” if need be if the courts rule against this republic to pass thereby legislation to order the immediate removal (withdrawal) of the “ENTIRE” Federal OSHA agency. All-State government must then declare that “THEY” will build “THEIR” own version of OSHA under the absolute sovereignty of State-control.
Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution gives the Federal government the authority to offer federal grant funds to states and localities that are “contingent” on the recipients engaging in, or refraining from, certain activities.
Take Note: The United States Supreme Court clearly articulated certain limitations on the exercise of this power. 1987 decision, South Dakota v. Dole, which remains a leading case relating to the spending power of the federal government, the “HIGH COURT” held that legislation enacted pursuant to the Spending Clause must be pursuit of the “general welfare.” The Supreme Court also held that any “required conditions attached to the receipt of federal funds must meet the following constitutional guidelines…
- Be unambiguously established (thus allowing recipients to accept or reject them knowingly.
- Be germane (relevant) to the federal interest in national programs and projects directed with federal dollars.
- Can “NOT” violate other legal provisions of the United States Constitution. Such as the First Amendment, Due Process, or taking clauses of the Fifth Amendment.
- KEYNOTE: The “HIGH COURT” ruled that the Federal Government “NOT” cross the line from enticement to impermissible coercion, MEANING: State Governments have “NO REAL CHOICE” but to accept the funding and enact or administer a federal regulatory program.
Under Supreme Court constitutional decision making regarding South Dakota v. Dole, the federal powers can not cross the line from enticement to impermissible coercion. Sure the feds might withhold federal funds protecting their interests, but this would slowly return State’s Rights protected under the Tenth Amendment Clause of the United States Constitution.
DATA —> Indicating Covid Vaccine Injury(s)
Source(s): Humans Are Free Website
Claim(s): “European Union’s Database Of Adverse Drug Reactions For COVID-19 Shots: 20,595 DEAD And 1.9 Million Injured (50% SERIOUS)”
Reference Links: COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414) EU Gov URL
COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH EU Gov URL
COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) EU Gov URL
EU Medicines Agency Background
“… This website was launched by the European Medicines Agency in 2012 to provide public access to reports of suspected side effects (also known as suspected adverse drug reactions). These reports are submitted electronically to EudraVigilance by national medicines regulatory authorities and by pharmaceutical companies that hold marketing authorisations (licences) for the medicines …”
DATA —> Indicating Covid Virus & HIV Connection (Bio-Weapon?)
Source(s): bioRxiv URL Note: bioRxiv posts many COVID19-related papers. A reminder: they have not been formally peer-reviewed and should not guide health-related
Note: Health Feed Back Website Claims the study is “WRONG” Date: Posted February 02, 2020
Reference Link: Click Here
DATA —> COVID-19 Data Collection
Comorbidity & Federal Law
A Historical Retrospective
Source(s): State of the Nation
Study (PDF): IPAK PHPI
Claim(s): “Study finds CDC inflated COVID numbers by 1,600%”
DATA —> Israeli Study Finds Vaccinated People are “Greater Risk”
Of Hospitalization … 13x More Likely to Catch Covid-19 (Over Natural Immunity)
Source(s): Web Archive Quote: —> ‘This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer Study (PDF): medRxiv.org lasting and stronge protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, ‘ the team of researchers wrote.”
Claim(s): A new study out of Israel has seemingly confirmed that individuals who have natural immunity have better protection against the NEW DELTA VARIANT than people who are fully vaccinated.
VIDEO —> FDA Cynical Plot Protecting Vaccine with Legal Liability
From a Vaccinologist – Vaccines “NOT” Legally Approved…
Source(s): LeoHomann URL <— READ ENTIRE ARTICLE & WATCH VIDEO
Fight For USA News URL <— “Major US Law Firm Confirms”
“… “The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness
The “certain differences” are not specified, but it is perfectly clear that the two jabs are legally distinct. …”
Vaccine “NOT” legally approved (Meaning: Vaccine(s) Are Still Experimental)
“ … The below analysis by Children’s Health Defense explains the trickery in which the FDA has engaged — all for the legal benefit of the Big Pharma giant Pfizer and the detriment of American citizens.
There is a huge real-world difference between products under an EUA compared with those that FDA has fully licensed. EUA products are experimental under U.S law.
Both the Nuremberg Code and Federal Regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.
U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines …”
DATA —> Study Questions if Vaccinated Individuals Getting AIDS???
Study PDF: Public Health England
“… People aged 40-69 have already lost 40% of their immune system capability and are losing it progressively at 3.3% to 6.4% per week.
Weekly Decline in doubly vaccinated immune system performance compared to unvaccinated people …” (The Expose).
STUDY UPDATES —> Public Health England Website URL: The Expose
“… The 5 Public Health England (PHE) tables below from their excellent Vaccine Surveillance Report of all fully genome sequenced delta cases, separated by 5 weeks, clearly show the progressive damage that the vaccines are doing to the immune system’s response. PHE have done so much great work and the picture is very clear.
Here is the weekly decline in doubly vaccinated immune system performance compared to unvaxxed people. Vaccine efficacy is measured using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula…
(Unvaxxed case rate – Vaxxed case rate)/the Larger of Unvaxxed or Vaxxed case rate – We are using the ratio of vaxxed to unvaxxed case numbers to determine vaccine efficiency just as Pfizer itself does. …”
“Maybe” just “MAYBE” we should do more testing on this COVID Vaccine before
possibly giving people a destroyed immune system??????????????????????????????
“… With 99.7% of adults in the Irish county of Waterford having received the COVID shots, they have the highest per-capita case rate of COVID anywhere in the country. Are they now going to suggest it’s the fault of the 0.3%?! …”
Investment Watch Website: Click Here
“MAYBE” the Public Health England DATA is correct regarding immune systems getting destroyed over COVID vaccinations?
- DATA —> Indicating Covid Virus & HIV Connection (Bio-Weapon?)
Investment Watch Website: Click Here
“MAYBE” the Public Health England DATA is correct regarding immune systems getting destroyed over COVID vaccinations? & “MAYBE” Covid is a Bio-Weapon?
SIDE LINKS (HIV MEDICATIONS TREATING COVID PATIENTS):
POZ Website (HIV Website): Click Here
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
“… Antiretrovirals drugs were initially considered for use in the treatment of COVID-19 based on virtual screening and in vitro studies. Published data indicate that most of patients infected with the virus causing COVID-19 have mild to moderate symptoms, have good clinical outcomes and do not require hospitalization. In some cases, patients admitted to the hospital were given an antiretroviral drug, most often lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (LPV/r) or, less frequently, darunavir boosted with ritonavir (DRV/r). Studies assessing the potential benefit of an antiretroviral drug on COVID-19 were mostly carried out in HIV-negative individuals. …”
Reference Link: Click Here
DATA —> Young People Dying More in Car Crashes Over COVID-19?
Source(s): Mackinac URL
Young car-drivers have a higher risk of dying in a car accident before COVID-19” – Article claims with DATA.
“… The 6.9 million people in Michigan who are under 55, about 69% of the state’s population, had a 0.009% chance of dying in a motor vehicle crash in 2019. Their chance of dying from COVID-19 in 2020 was 0.012%, a difference of just 0.003 percentage points. Another way of saying this is that 99.99% of people under 55 in Michigan, no matter their health condition, lived through the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 — nearly the same percentage that lived through all the traffic accidents in 2019.
For younger populations, car crashes were more deadly than COVID-19. For Michiganders under 45, the chance of dying in a car crash in 2019 was almost double that of dying from the coronavirus in 2020. …”
- The legal United States Constitution’s establishes the framework that under constitutional text that its documentation is the “SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.”
Oral Argument: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” Article VI Section 2.
Oral Argument #5 establishes that within this Independent COVID Research that the Constitution must be enforced as Supreme Law.
Therefore let us take into legal consideration the following historical view point of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, writing a separate dissent, which stated:
1950 Supreme Court case, Feres v. United States …
“… No judicially crafted rule should insulate from liability the involuntary and unknowing human experimentation alleged to have occurred in this case. Indeed, as Justice Brennan observes, the United States played an instrumental role in the criminal prosecution of Nazi officials who experimented with human subjects during the Second World War, and the standards that the Nuremberg Military Tribunals developed to judge the behavior of the defendants stated that the ‘voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential … to satisfy moral, ethical, and legal concepts.’ If this principle is violated, the very least that society can do is to see that the victims are compensated, as best they can be, by the perpetrators …”
Take Note: This is the only Supreme Court case to address the application of the Nuremberg Code regarding experimentation sponsored by the United States government. The lawsuit was unsuccessful, however during this period in history this case did put the Army on notice and it did shape ethical and moral beliefs throughout the U.S. regarding experiments on human subjects.
Take Note: This case was regarding U.S. Military Service-members and “NOT” civilians.
The Anti-Vax-Mandaters therefore proclaim (believe) “Experimental Medical Treatment” can “NOT” be forced upon any human population as it is a “DIRECT VIOLATION” of human rights. This research which has established that these vaccines are actually “Experimental” and are not correctly medically licensed as proclaimed by many in the news media and Federal Government (FDA / etc.).
ReCaping: VIDEO —> FDA Cynical Plot Protecting Vaccine with Legal Liability
From a Vaccinologist – Vaccines “NOT” Legally Approved…
Illustrated under the EUA products these current license is a “Violation of Law” to try to make any medical treatment mandatory. This is “NOT” just a violation of 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) “BUT” the Nuremberg Code that the United States Army help utilize while conducting Nazi trials on war-crime criminals speaks volumes.
Should not the United States citizens accept anything less protecting “THEIR” own bodies from experimental medical treatment as well? Should this “NOT” be considered a violation of a basic human right?
- 1905 Supreme Court Case Jacobson v. Massachusetts
Oral Argument: The Court ruled that “States” have authority to mandate vaccinations when needed, “NOT” the United States “FEDERAL” Government.
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1905 that the Constitution allows “State” governments to mandate vaccination on their citizens during a crisis. This entire ruling did “NOT” give Uncle Sam (The Feds) this delegated power. This interpretation would thus render back to the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution. Therefore, this ruling should “NOT” give President Joe Biden constitutional powers to “mandate” employees or employers with a vaccine mandate under OSHA.
In the Jacobson case, the State of Massachusetts delegated local authorities the power to mandate smallpox vaccines during a smallpox outbreak. The city of Cambridge required an ordinance for all people not vaccinated to get vaccinated, or refusal would result in a monetary fine for non-compliers. The Supreme Court upheld that on the grounds of individual rights, “NO” right is absolute. Interpretational Meaning: During a crisis, “rights” under a problematic-situations can be restricted. “HOWEVER,” although “MANY” rational individuals today would agree that crises can limit legal “RIGHTS,” the Court ruled “only STATE / LOCAL governments” can order a vaccination medical mandate on on the people.
DATA —> Understanding the Risk Analysis pertaining to COVID
Basic Elementary Level:
What is the “RISK ANALYSIS” of this historic novel Covid-19 virus? Many liberal-wing media pundits proclaim that this virus is so deadly that we needed a national shutdown, force vaccinations, mask-wearing, and never-ending booster shots for “YEARS TO COME.” Even a part of the conservative-wing proclaims these same fear-mongering policies.
The problem, however, is we see in the United States a cultural back-fighting by the average American to comply with these various and draconian policies as they are anti-American policies, not found within our democratic constitutional republic historically speaking.
For years, most Americans (left and right) have slowly lost trust in the mainstream media as various polls will illustrate this truthful statement as a reality.
Main Stream Media Public Trust
Gallup Poll: New Gallup poll shows consistent distrust in media
Gallup Poll: Trust in media nears record low: Gallup
For years, many Americans (left and right) have lost faith in our national government trust as well. Various polls illustrates this reality.
Government Public Trust
Gallup Poll: Americans’ Trust in Government Remains Low
Gallup Poll: Poll finds trust of federal government runs low
Covid-19, which shook the nation by surprise, did “NOT” help bring the United States citizens together by uniting as it ended up dividing liberals and conservatives even further than in recent years.
In my opinion, speculatively speaking, politicians, instead of uniting in fighting this virus instead took this crisis and used it to scare Americans into submission. Politicians as well used this virus to shift the blame on the current administration in power. During the outbreak, the democrats screamed “Trump” was at fault. During Biden’s administration, Republicans are just as guilty.
In my opinion, speculatively speaking, “some” politicians want to use this crisis and fundamentally change America towards a more authoritarian style of government.
“… But the report is unequivocal. “China’s bold approach to contain the rapid spread of this new respiratory pathogen has changed the course of a rapidly escalating and deadly epidemic,” it says. “This decline in COVID-19 cases across China is real.
The question now is whether the world can take lessons from China’s apparent success—and whether the massive lockdowns and electronic surveillance measures imposed by an authoritarian government would work in other countries. “When you spend 20, 30 years in this business it’s like, ‘Seriously, you’re going to try and change that with those tactics?'” says Bruce Aylward, a Canadian WHO epidemiologist who led the international team and briefed journalists about its findings in Beijing and Geneva last week. “Hundreds of thousands of people in China did not get COVID-19 because of this aggressive response. …”
News Link: Science .ORG Website
HOWEVER, this RESEARCH ARTICLE is “NOT,” designed to spread such a possible conspiracy theory regarding a “deep-state” coup to fundamental transformation America into a more authoritarian statehood. Regardless if those claims have validity or “NOT,” millions of Americans, culturally speaking, will not submit naturally as well towards stringent policies like China utilized during the beginning stages of the outbreak. Why? Because America’s birth as a nation got crafted differently over other countries. Meaning: Its (USA) founders historical blueprints designed a system to liberate individuals from authoritarian rule. That is why the U.S. Constitution only grants delegated powers authorized by the consent of the people.
SO how can America best serve defeating this novel virus outbreak known a the COVID-19 virus while upholding key historical constitutional restraints?
A Patriots Humble Opinion,
A.) Risk Analysis pertaining to COVID Data
LOOKING AT THE NUMBERS
UNITED STATES COVID DATA
AP News URL: Click Here
Admits that the rate of survival is 98.2% for most Americans.
Pertaining to COVID recovery rates we must take into consideration that it is important to create categories pertaining to individual(s). Some EXAMPLES: sex, age, preexisting medical conditions such as the following: HIV, Cancer, etc.
Taking RAW DATA & Lumping everyone into the same category is misleading and immoral.
The RED Box with a URL inside it (Ap News) illustrates in the article clearly why it is important to understand the survival rate number being so high. Basically: Healthy young adults virtually have “NO” real threat pertaining to the COVID-19 Virus.
What the bias media pushes is that COVID is “SO-DEADLY” to the general population. Instead they should be reporting the numbers to the general public into proper categories. Age, Sex (F/M), Pre-Existing Medical Conditions & etc..
“… A popular tweet this week, however, used the survival statistic without key context. “Unvaccinated, you can get COVID and have over 99% chance of survival. Get vaccinated and you can STILL get COVID and will still have over 99% chance of survival,” reads the tweet.
The message is misleading. The average for the entire country cannot be used to calculate an individual’s chance of dying from the virus. The likelihood that a COVID-19 infection will result in death increases with age and if the patient has a pre-existing condition. …”
This article is “CORRECT” when claiming that you can “NOT” look at an overall number and claim something as factual.
Example: A survival rate of an individual with HIV with low T-cells would “most likely” not be in the 99% recovery rate.
LOOKING AT SIMPLE CHARTS
In many debates with friends, co-workers, and family members, they “LIKE” to produce overall one-size-fits-all “CDC” Numbers saying, you see why we need mandatory vaccination?
However, these groups of individuals refuse to look at the “OVERALL DATA” and understand that every action has a reaction, not just individuals but this rule applies within any collective society as well.
Western classical liberal democratic orders like America are “NOT” going to submit to a continuous authoritarian rule over our populations willingly. This statement is only one example when previously claiming “every action has a reaction,” what cost are we willing to take in our constitutional system? What individual freedoms are we going to surrender? Will we ever get these freedoms back?
Can we win the war on “COVID” without losing our freedoms? I believe so and based on a scientific model that also upholds to our moral belief in constitutional liberty.
If we can understand the risks of Covid based on segregating the numbers of
“HIGH RISK” with “LOW RISK” groups, we could make better choices that protect constitutional liberties.
In my opinion, if I were in power as President of the United States, these are simple things I would have worked with Congress on …
HIGH RISK INDIVIDUALS
- Unemployment Benefits (Not Ending) Until Crisis Ends (Only Match 1.00 for 1.00)
- All Employee / State Benefits (Keep) Health Care, Etc.
- Vaccination Free (By Choice) – Only After Normal Proper Testing
- Increase Social Security Benefits (Elderly = High Risk)
LOW RISK INDIVIDUALS
- No Unemployment Benefits (Building Natural Immunity)
- Vaccination Free (By Choice) – Only After Normal Proper Testing
LOW RISK INDIVIDUALS HELPING OUT HIGH RISK INDIVIDUALS
- If a person is taking care of a “HIGH RISK” individual they can have the same benefits as a high risk individual. Sign “notarized documentation” proving they are helping “HIGH RISK” individual(s). Family connection “REQUIRED” & non-family – connection with an organization (non-profits) helping those in need during the pandemic.
- Pay extra unemployment benefits (bonus pay) for helping their “HIGH RISK” family members
B.) Federal Funding to State and Local Territories
- Give funding to schools to sanitize, clean, etc. Allow for students of “HIGH RISK” to leave class rooms and do online schooling. Promote: Natural Immunity for “Low Risk Individuals”
- Funding for other various needed programs, projects, etc.. The point is we can in our society win the “WAR ON COVID” without giving up our freedoms.
C.) Upholding to Constitutional Restraints
- Already mentioned several times, this war is winnable while making sure our leaders uphold to constitutional restraints which protects our individual identities as a people.
RECAPPING —> The Importance of Risk Analysis
Americans must be careful “NOT” to give in to a system of fear when making decisions that any form of governmental institution proclaims you need to do. Historically speaking, government institutions are the most significant “MASS MURDERERS OF ALL TIME.”
The Murder of
Democide: The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicized, and mass murder. Genocide is horrible, an abomination of our species, totally unacceptable.
Reference Link: Definition OF Democide (Genocide and Mass Murder)
George Orwell > Quote > Book: 1984
“Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.”
Most people physiologically have a mechanism built within their “HUMAN NATURE” when dangerous thoughts, outcomes (public or private) occur. This mechanism, a.k.a. Crime-Stop, kicks in the subconsciousness of man and is why I believe “MOST” humans naturally submit themselves to authoritarians throughout history. This sad reality is “WHY” Democide (Mass Genocide) occurs throughout civilizations.
For Example, imagine looking at the already mentioned scientific studies and news articles within this “REPORT” pushing the narrative that the covid virus might have been a biological weapon? Imagine finding out that these scientific studies and news articles (regardless of source, alternative media, or mainstream media) have scientific creditability?
Now imagine you already have taken the “COVID” vaccines and booster shots. What would be a person’s reaction at first? Now let us take this one step further; imagine you gave your four-year-old child these vaccines and boosters?
Would this shocking truth be so horrifying that the average individual would want to shut down any evidence leading to this plausible discovery?
Just Imagine, Covid-19, Is a Biological Weapon with HIV inside of it? Imagine the Covid Vaccines + Boosters are Destroying the Immune Systems (Causing AIDS or a style of AIDS)?
What Reaction Would You Have?
Recommend Relooking At Pages 11-12
Of This Independent Covid Research Report
Now, many will proclaim this coverup is so sinister that something like this could “NEVER” happen in the United States or on a massive global scale.
The purpose behind this “REPORT” is not to necessarily promote one conspiracy from another conspiracy. Nor is the report claiming within this research that the international foes of political elites purposefully created a bioweapon to be released. Maybe but maybe not. Possibly this “PROCLAIMED” bioweapon was released by a freak accident in a laboratory, and coverups are happening to cover criminal and civil national/international legal suits of liabilities against such entities? The purpose behind this section within this “REPORT” is to give more credence to the need for “EVERY INDIVIDUAL” to think critically and analyze “DATA” and verify whatever source of media (mainstream or alternative media) proclaims.
OR, maybe this virus naturally mutated and was sincerely found in a market place in Wuhan, China.
To a beloved family member of mine, their name out of respect shall stay irrelevant, who gave me the motivation to write this Independent Covid Research Report, “It is NOT that the numbers you use are necessarily wrong mathematically speaking. It is how the math is being used by NOT analyzing, in my humble opinion, a proper analysis of the covid situation.
Example: How many individuals in their eighties died because the medical institutions proclaimed covid? How many individuals who died had AIDS for years before covid hit them? How many individuals died because of cancer? All of these HIGH-RISK individuals who would have probably been killed WITH OR WITHOUT COVID by the numbers you presented play a substantial role mathematically and scientifically when understanding this global pandemic. This role plays into the policies we should and should not enact into law, incredibly draconian dictatorial policies that can affect generations to come in a democratic nation like the United States Constitutional Republic.
Please remember numbers change based on the finding of analysis one receives and calculates.
Example: “… In the United States in 2018, the death rate was highest among those aged 85 and over, with about 15,504 men and 12,870 women per 100,000 of the population passing away. For all ages, the death rate was at 905.2 per 100,000 of the population for males, and 831.6 per 100,000 of the population for women. …”. Reference Link: Click Here
Should we not subtract these groups of individuals from the fatality death rate(s) of covid’s seriousness when these “VERY HIGH RISK” individuals would have statistically died regardless from the flu, heart attacks, etc.?
In my sincere opinion, one plan, one diagnosis fits all policy is not the direction Americans should be heading. The educated approach looks at the overwhelming data from all sources and verifies to the absolute best creditability possible independently. Therefore, one will retrieve a more substantial mathematical number to understand the pandemic’s seriousness and how to win the war on Covid 19.
THE SHOCKING TRUTH …
“Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not? and do ye not remember?”
What we are witnessing today is in my entire sincere being of a person is the fulfillment of “END TIME PROPHECY.” At a minimum, we are seeing the final days before the rapture occurs and the beginning of Jacob’s Trouble Begins (Jeremiah 30:7), taking out any notion of conspiracy theories relating to the covid-19 global pandemic, this covid-19 virus vaccine at minimally is preparing for the days that the Antichrist requires his “Mark of the Beast.”
“And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” Revelation 13:16-17.
The year is 2021, and the technological advancements are finally here to achieve the needed end-time antichrist global government order. Daniel 12:4. The hearts of man is prepped for destruction. The itching ears have listened to what they wanted, not what they needed.
“For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;” 2 Timothy 4:3.
Exciting for believers and still sad for those lost is coming short of our citizens seeking national repentance. Nothing will probably stop our current direction towards finally fulfilling the scriptural prophecy foretold thousands of years ago in God’s Holy Word.
Let God be true and every man a liar.
“God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.” Romans 3:4.
Let His Holy Word get preached among the nations. I never imagined that we would be debating a national vaccine mandate or get refused to buy or sell potentially goods and services in my lifetime. The creditability of the Holy Scriptures comes true in God’s Word to those critics who still can “NOT” see God’s Word as the absolute truth given upon humanity.
Psalms 115:5-8 — They have mouths, but they speak not: have they, but they see not: They have ears, but they hear not: noses have they, but they smell not: They have hands, but they handle not: feet have they, but they walk not: neither speak they through their throat. They that make them are like unto them; so is every one that trusteth in them.
The Covid Vaccine is “NOT” the Mark of the Beast. Nor have we entered in the Great Tribulation “YET” as this is being written. The purpose behind this section is to warn those who have ears and eye to hear and see willingly before they enter this period of God’s designed timing.
If you would like to learn more about end-time events or learn more about God’s Truth please visit the ministry website of “All Will Stand Website.”
A great book published by Timothy Joesph Medsker and Brandon Everett Schuchardt titled: The End is available only in various formats. Visit the All Will Stand Website to learn more.
You can also purchase a paper or electronic copy of “The End” Book by Clicking Here.
Jesus Proclaimed – “I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.” Luke 5:32.
Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord. Acts 3:18-19